Biased 16S rDNA PCR amplification caused by interference from DNA flanking the template region.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Biased 16S rDNA PCR amplification caused by interference from DNA flanking the template region. / Hansen, Martin Christian; Tolker-Nielsen, Tim; Givskov, Michael; Molin, Søren.

In: FEMS Microbiology Ecology, Vol. 26, 1998, p. 141-149.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hansen, MC, Tolker-Nielsen, T, Givskov, M & Molin, S 1998, 'Biased 16S rDNA PCR amplification caused by interference from DNA flanking the template region.', FEMS Microbiology Ecology, vol. 26, pp. 141-149.

APA

Hansen, M. C., Tolker-Nielsen, T., Givskov, M., & Molin, S. (1998). Biased 16S rDNA PCR amplification caused by interference from DNA flanking the template region. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 26, 141-149.

Vancouver

Hansen MC, Tolker-Nielsen T, Givskov M, Molin S. Biased 16S rDNA PCR amplification caused by interference from DNA flanking the template region. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 1998;26:141-149.

Author

Hansen, Martin Christian ; Tolker-Nielsen, Tim ; Givskov, Michael ; Molin, Søren. / Biased 16S rDNA PCR amplification caused by interference from DNA flanking the template region. In: FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 1998 ; Vol. 26. pp. 141-149.

Bibtex

@article{3baba280bd4511dd8e02000ea68e967b,
title = "Biased 16S rDNA PCR amplification caused by interference from DNA flanking the template region.",
abstract = "PCR amplification of 16S rDNA was found to be highly biased, so that the rDNA from one species out of four waspreferentially amplified. We present evidence that the observed PCR bias most likely occurs because the genomic DNA of some species contains segments outside the amplified sequence that inhibit the initial PCR steps. Attempts to overcome this bias by use of a `touch down' PCR procedure or by performing PCR in the presence of denaturants or cosolvents such as acetamide, DMSO, or glycerol were unsuccessful. Since the PCR inhibiting interference from template flanking DNA segments evidently is dependent on the position of the primer sites, we suggest that community diversity analysis based on PCR amplification of 16S rDNA can be improved by extending the procedure from comparative analysis of 16S rDNA amplified by use of only one primer set to a procedure involving at least two different 16S rDNA PCR amplifications performed with different primer sets.",
author = "Hansen, {Martin Christian} and Tim Tolker-Nielsen and Michael Givskov and S{\o}ren Molin",
note = "Paper id:: 0168-6496 / 98 / $19.00",
year = "1998",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "141--149",
journal = "F E M S Microbiology Ecology",
issn = "0168-6496",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biased 16S rDNA PCR amplification caused by interference from DNA flanking the template region.

AU - Hansen, Martin Christian

AU - Tolker-Nielsen, Tim

AU - Givskov, Michael

AU - Molin, Søren

N1 - Paper id:: 0168-6496 / 98 / $19.00

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - PCR amplification of 16S rDNA was found to be highly biased, so that the rDNA from one species out of four waspreferentially amplified. We present evidence that the observed PCR bias most likely occurs because the genomic DNA of some species contains segments outside the amplified sequence that inhibit the initial PCR steps. Attempts to overcome this bias by use of a `touch down' PCR procedure or by performing PCR in the presence of denaturants or cosolvents such as acetamide, DMSO, or glycerol were unsuccessful. Since the PCR inhibiting interference from template flanking DNA segments evidently is dependent on the position of the primer sites, we suggest that community diversity analysis based on PCR amplification of 16S rDNA can be improved by extending the procedure from comparative analysis of 16S rDNA amplified by use of only one primer set to a procedure involving at least two different 16S rDNA PCR amplifications performed with different primer sets.

AB - PCR amplification of 16S rDNA was found to be highly biased, so that the rDNA from one species out of four waspreferentially amplified. We present evidence that the observed PCR bias most likely occurs because the genomic DNA of some species contains segments outside the amplified sequence that inhibit the initial PCR steps. Attempts to overcome this bias by use of a `touch down' PCR procedure or by performing PCR in the presence of denaturants or cosolvents such as acetamide, DMSO, or glycerol were unsuccessful. Since the PCR inhibiting interference from template flanking DNA segments evidently is dependent on the position of the primer sites, we suggest that community diversity analysis based on PCR amplification of 16S rDNA can be improved by extending the procedure from comparative analysis of 16S rDNA amplified by use of only one primer set to a procedure involving at least two different 16S rDNA PCR amplifications performed with different primer sets.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 26

SP - 141

EP - 149

JO - F E M S Microbiology Ecology

JF - F E M S Microbiology Ecology

SN - 0168-6496

ER -

ID: 8780936