The impact of mental models on the treatment and research of chronic infections due to biofilms

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The impact of mental models on the treatment and research of chronic infections due to biofilms. / Bjarnsholt, Thomas; Mastroianni, Enrico; Kirketerp-Møller, Klaus; Stewart, Philip S.; Mähr, Aline Meret; Domínguez Cabañes, Alonso; Nørager, Rune.

In: APMIS, Vol. 129, No. 10, 2021, p. 598-606.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Bjarnsholt, T, Mastroianni, E, Kirketerp-Møller, K, Stewart, PS, Mähr, AM, Domínguez Cabañes, A & Nørager, R 2021, 'The impact of mental models on the treatment and research of chronic infections due to biofilms', APMIS, vol. 129, no. 10, pp. 598-606. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.13163

APA

Bjarnsholt, T., Mastroianni, E., Kirketerp-Møller, K., Stewart, P. S., Mähr, A. M., Domínguez Cabañes, A., & Nørager, R. (2021). The impact of mental models on the treatment and research of chronic infections due to biofilms. APMIS, 129(10), 598-606. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.13163

Vancouver

Bjarnsholt T, Mastroianni E, Kirketerp-Møller K, Stewart PS, Mähr AM, Domínguez Cabañes A et al. The impact of mental models on the treatment and research of chronic infections due to biofilms. APMIS. 2021;129(10):598-606. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.13163

Author

Bjarnsholt, Thomas ; Mastroianni, Enrico ; Kirketerp-Møller, Klaus ; Stewart, Philip S. ; Mähr, Aline Meret ; Domínguez Cabañes, Alonso ; Nørager, Rune. / The impact of mental models on the treatment and research of chronic infections due to biofilms. In: APMIS. 2021 ; Vol. 129, No. 10. pp. 598-606.

Bibtex

@article{13beb3b8e414474ca860019ba9f1e5ea,
title = "The impact of mental models on the treatment and research of chronic infections due to biofilms",
abstract = "Research on biofilms is predominantly made in in vitro contexts. However, in vivo observation of biofilms in human chronic infections shows distinct differences compared to in vitro biofilm growth. This could imply the use of an inadequate mental model both in research and healthcare practices. Drawing on knowledge from the cognitive sciences, we hypothesise that the predominance of in vitro research on biofilms is skewed towards a mental model promoting wrong inferences for researchers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in the in vivo context. To explore the prevalence of such a mental model, we carried out a qualitative image analysis in which biofilm illustrations from a Google image search were coded for typical in vitro or in vivo characteristics. Further, to investigate potential misinformed and unhelpful clinical interventions related to biofilms, we conducted a quantitative questionnaire among HCPs. The questions were designed to test whether knowledge about in vitro biofilms was used in an in vivo context. This questionnaire was analysed through a chi-squared test. Most biofilm illustrations were consistent with the in vitro model. A statistical analysis of survey responses revealed that HCPs have adequate knowledge about biofilm but often respond incorrectly when asked to apply their knowledge to in vivo contexts. The outcome of this research points to a prevalent and consolidated mental model derived from in vitro observations. This model has likely been made dominant by HCPs{\textquoteright} frequent exposure to visual depictions in articles and presentations. The prevalence of the in vitro model sets up the possibility of erroneous claims when the in vitro model is inadequately applied to in vivo contexts. This has potential implications for HCPs working in fields involving biofilm, such as wound care treatment.",
keywords = "biofilms, chronic infections, in vitro, in vivo, Mental models",
author = "Thomas Bjarnsholt and Enrico Mastroianni and Klaus Kirketerp-M{\o}ller and Stewart, {Philip S.} and M{\"a}hr, {Aline Meret} and {Dom{\'i}nguez Caba{\~n}es}, Alonso and Rune N{\o}rager",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Scandinavian Societies for Medical Microbiology and Pathology",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1111/apm.13163",
language = "English",
volume = "129",
pages = "598--606",
journal = "A P M I S. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica",
issn = "0903-4641",
publisher = "Wiley Online",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of mental models on the treatment and research of chronic infections due to biofilms

AU - Bjarnsholt, Thomas

AU - Mastroianni, Enrico

AU - Kirketerp-Møller, Klaus

AU - Stewart, Philip S.

AU - Mähr, Aline Meret

AU - Domínguez Cabañes, Alonso

AU - Nørager, Rune

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Scandinavian Societies for Medical Microbiology and Pathology

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Research on biofilms is predominantly made in in vitro contexts. However, in vivo observation of biofilms in human chronic infections shows distinct differences compared to in vitro biofilm growth. This could imply the use of an inadequate mental model both in research and healthcare practices. Drawing on knowledge from the cognitive sciences, we hypothesise that the predominance of in vitro research on biofilms is skewed towards a mental model promoting wrong inferences for researchers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in the in vivo context. To explore the prevalence of such a mental model, we carried out a qualitative image analysis in which biofilm illustrations from a Google image search were coded for typical in vitro or in vivo characteristics. Further, to investigate potential misinformed and unhelpful clinical interventions related to biofilms, we conducted a quantitative questionnaire among HCPs. The questions were designed to test whether knowledge about in vitro biofilms was used in an in vivo context. This questionnaire was analysed through a chi-squared test. Most biofilm illustrations were consistent with the in vitro model. A statistical analysis of survey responses revealed that HCPs have adequate knowledge about biofilm but often respond incorrectly when asked to apply their knowledge to in vivo contexts. The outcome of this research points to a prevalent and consolidated mental model derived from in vitro observations. This model has likely been made dominant by HCPs’ frequent exposure to visual depictions in articles and presentations. The prevalence of the in vitro model sets up the possibility of erroneous claims when the in vitro model is inadequately applied to in vivo contexts. This has potential implications for HCPs working in fields involving biofilm, such as wound care treatment.

AB - Research on biofilms is predominantly made in in vitro contexts. However, in vivo observation of biofilms in human chronic infections shows distinct differences compared to in vitro biofilm growth. This could imply the use of an inadequate mental model both in research and healthcare practices. Drawing on knowledge from the cognitive sciences, we hypothesise that the predominance of in vitro research on biofilms is skewed towards a mental model promoting wrong inferences for researchers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in the in vivo context. To explore the prevalence of such a mental model, we carried out a qualitative image analysis in which biofilm illustrations from a Google image search were coded for typical in vitro or in vivo characteristics. Further, to investigate potential misinformed and unhelpful clinical interventions related to biofilms, we conducted a quantitative questionnaire among HCPs. The questions were designed to test whether knowledge about in vitro biofilms was used in an in vivo context. This questionnaire was analysed through a chi-squared test. Most biofilm illustrations were consistent with the in vitro model. A statistical analysis of survey responses revealed that HCPs have adequate knowledge about biofilm but often respond incorrectly when asked to apply their knowledge to in vivo contexts. The outcome of this research points to a prevalent and consolidated mental model derived from in vitro observations. This model has likely been made dominant by HCPs’ frequent exposure to visual depictions in articles and presentations. The prevalence of the in vitro model sets up the possibility of erroneous claims when the in vitro model is inadequately applied to in vivo contexts. This has potential implications for HCPs working in fields involving biofilm, such as wound care treatment.

KW - biofilms

KW - chronic infections

KW - in vitro

KW - in vivo

KW - Mental models

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111829511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/apm.13163

DO - 10.1111/apm.13163

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34120370

AN - SCOPUS:85111829511

VL - 129

SP - 598

EP - 606

JO - A P M I S. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica

JF - A P M I S. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica

SN - 0903-4641

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 385116589